Kelly v. Moesslang
In re the Matter of: BETTE LYN KELLY, Appellant,
v.
PETER MOESSLANG, Respondent.
No. 29210-0-III
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISIION THREE
Dated: September 18, 2012
(Cons. w/ No. 29746-2-III)
PUBLISHED OPINION
In re the Matter of: BETTE LYN KELLY, Appellant,
v.
PETER MOESSLANG, Respondent.
No. 29210-0-III
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISIION THREE
Dated: September 18, 2012
(Cons. w/ No. 29746-2-III)
PUBLISHED OPINION
54 P.3d 1218
113 Wash.App. 243
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
David R. ISRAEL, Defendant, and
Willie James King, and each of them, Appellant.
State of Washington, Appellant/Cross Respondent,
v.
David R. Israel, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and
Willie James King, and each of them, Defendant.
Nos. 44731-9-I, 45051-4-I, 45956-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
September 9, 2002.
LE & ASSOCIATES, PS, a professional service corporation, Respondent,
v.
ROBERTO DIAZ-LUONG, and LAN THI NGUYEN, husband
and wife and the marital community comprised thereof, Appellants.
No. 66695-9-I
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
FILED: July 9, 2012
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
202 P.3d 388
149 Wn. App. 648
STATE of Washington, Respondent and Cross Appellant,
v.
Robert Corcoran DINGMAN, Appellant and Cross Respondent.
No. 34719-9-II.
No. 35949-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
March 10, 2009.
¶ 1 Robert Dingman appeals his conviction of 16 counts of first degree theft and 11
[202 P.3d 389]
NIKKI M. WILSON, an individual; PAMELA PETERSON, an individual, Appellants,
v.
LAWRENCE FRYE, GUY CASEY, as individuals, and GIL CORPORATION d/b/a FRIENDLY DUCK RESTAURANT, Respondents.
No. 36088-8-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
February 5, 2004.
47 Wn.App. 514
735 P.2d 1362
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Laurence M. OLSON, Appellant.
No. 16724-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington,
Division 1.
April 29, 1987.
Laurence M. Olson appeals from a judgment and sentence for the crime of computer trespass. He contends that this conduct did not come within the prohibition of the statute.
RCW 9A.52.110 reads as follows:
Page 515
STATE of Washington, Respondent
v.
Lloyd James HIGGINS, Appellant.
No. 33833-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
December 5, 2006.
PUBLISHED OPINION
Joshua HARRIS, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable Edsonya CHARLES, Director of King County Adult Detention and City of Seattle, Respondents.
No. 61629-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
August 31, 2009.
¶ 1 A statute entitles felons detained before trial on electronic home monitoring to be credited for the time served. No statute entitles misdemeanants to the same credit. In view of the differences between felony and misdemeanor sentencing, we hold this distinction is rational and does not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Alvin Chester WIBLE III, Appellant.
No. 27164-8-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 9, 2002.
Alvin Chester Wible III appeals his conviction for five counts of possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct with sexual motivation. We affirm.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
REGNANDO CANTO LOPEZ, Appellant.
No. 24438-5-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
Filed: April 10, 2007.
Appeal from Spokane Superior Court. Docket No: 03-1-03407-1. Judgment or order under review. Date filed: 01/04/2005.