Infosec Cases

Wallace v. Halder

Brian Wallace, Administrator of the Estate of Norman E. Wallace, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Biswanath Halder, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92046.
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.
Released: July 30, 2009.
        Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. CV-591169.
        Affirmed.

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Hanna

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee
v.
Christopher HANNA, Appellant.
No. 247 EDA 2008.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued June 24, 2008.
Filed January 14, 2009.
      

OPINION:

        ¶ 1 Appellant, Christopher Hanna, appeals from the order entered on December 17, 2007, denying his petition to expunge. We vacate and remand.

        ¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts of the case as follows:

USA v. Kennedy

81 F.Supp.2d 1103
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Michael R. KENNEDY, Defendant.
No. 99-10105-01.
United States District Court, D. Kansas.
January 3, 2000.
      
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
        BELOT, District Judge.

        On August 25, 1999, Defendant Michael R. Kennedy was indicted for the intentional receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) (Doc. 1) and forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 2253. Before the court for its consideration are:

CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.

COMPUSERVE INCORPORATED, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBER PROMOTIONS, INC. and Sanford Wallace, Defendants.
No. C2-96-1070.
United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.
February 3, 1997.
 

        This case presents novel issues regarding the commercial use of the Internet, specifically the right of an online computer service to prevent a commercial enterprise from sending unsolicited electronic mail advertising to its subscribers.

Malin v. Singer

MIKE MALIN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
MARTIN D. SINGER et al., Defendants and Appellants.
B237804
COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Filed: July 16, 2013

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC466547)

        APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mary M. Strobel, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Chrisman v. City of Los Angeles

Kelly CHRISMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B184689.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8.
September 12, 2007.
 

        Kelly Chrisman appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandate ordering the Los Angeles Police Department to reinstate him as a police officer. We reverse and remand for further proceedings for the limited purpose of the department's reconsideration of the proper punishment for appellant's misconduct.